« Home again | Main | Home again »

April 12, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike R.

That is a fun translation. Nothing really to add, but thanks for sharing.

Say, do you have any interesting Shakespeare translations? I once saw Hamlet, Prinz von Dnemark, a German TV movie of Hamlet that was translated from English to German and then translated back from _the German translation_ to English, but it wasn't nearly as bad as I had hoped.

Cheers,

Mike

Randy McDonald

It's a minor pity about what has since happened to Milanese and its kindred tongues. Thanks for sharing.

Carlos

Um. Randy, the Milanese would be amused by your pity. They might be offended if they realized it was based on a perceived lack of agency.

Just FYI, the linguistic statements in that Wikipedia article, though hedged, are badly flawed. It's systemic to Wikipedia articles on languages in general, since Wikipedia uses Ethnologue's highly dubious extreme splitter and tree classification.

(Incidentally, Ethnologue is a creation of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, a Christian missionary group with a very interesting history. It's useful to keep that in mind when evaluating their methodology.)

Randy McDonald

Carlos:

Um. Randy, the Milanese would be amused by your pity. They might be offended if they realized it was based on a perceived lack of agency.

Let me unpack, and clarify.

It's a minor pity, only. It's clear enough that the decline of Lombard dialects was product of state policies accepted by the large majority of Lombards (Italian-language mass media, education, government services, et cetera), extending back to that "First we made Italy, next we must make Italians" phase of nation-building. It's hardly a consequence of, say, state terror; Lombardy is not the Donetsk Basin. It isn't even Wales. That Italian dialects seem to be used as a cudgel against outsiders, instead of a source of cultural capital that has to be extended to everyone (as is the theory with French in Qubec or Catalan in Catalonia) doesn't lend me immediately to the causes of their languages. Provenal's xenophobic head-in-the-sand approach didn't exactly work out well for that speech. Just as they aren't intrinsically positive, language shift and language loss aren't intrinsically negative.

The splitter-versus-uniter debate in languages is interesting--Mark Abley's readable Spoken Here takes a look at the case of Provenal (is it or is it not an Occitan dialect? ah, blessed isolating Flibrige). Based on the production of literature in many of the difference vernaculars of Italy (Venetian, Piedmontese, and Neapolitan seem to have the largest corpuses, from my admittedly superficial readings) and the definition of these vernaculars as languages by many of their speakers--the negative reactions to the
very recent designation of Italian as Italy's official language would otherwise be inexplicable--I'm inclined to treat them as languages.

Randy McDonald

As for the pity, I find it sad when small-minded people retreat into narrow dead-end solutions aimed at preserving what they like. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with small nations, after all, or small languages. But, if the people concerned see the future lying in rejecting these particular traditions, who am I to say anything but that it's sad that's the only way they can move forward.

Carlos

Randy, the privileging of Tuscan in northern Italy dates back to Petrarch in Venice. It's not a construction of late nineteenth-century nation-building. A cursory knowledge of the history of Italian literature would have told you this. Instead, you've trepanned a long, rich, and complicated story to fit your political prejudices.

I am shocked and dismayed at your confident ignorance. I find it sad when small-minded people use history tendentiously to make themselves feel politically in the right. For a time I hoped that you'd dodge that bullet, and then I hoped that it was just a phase. All I can say at this point is that it's been a very long phase, and that it's sad. Please move forward.

Randy McDonald

Carlos:

Yes, there's Petrarch; there's also Goldoni. There were multiple traditions, many of which could have been activated to different degrees if things had plausibly taken different routes.

[Y]ou've trepanned a long, rich, and complicated story to fit your political prejudices.

Um? The inability of Provenal to survive contact with French can be traced in large part to the xenophobic conservatism of many proponents of Provenal and the Felibrige's isolationism. Provenal signally failed to cope with urban mass civilization, or immigration, as effectively as Catalan in nearby Spain. The centralism of the French Third Republic had a lot to do with things, too, but it wasn't the only factor.

Small cultures and peoples have to be able to embrace innovation if they're to survive. I honestly don't see how this recognition necessarily represents a "trepanning" of anything. Common knowledge, that I'll agree.

I find it sad when small-minded people use history tendentiously to make themselves feel politically in the right.

! No, I'm not beating my wife, thanks for asking.

Carlos

Randy, you've got a problem. Several of them, in fact. Would you like me to dissect them out in the open, or would you like to take this to e-mail? Either way.

Next time, don't make smarmy political drive-by comments on a fun birthday post.

The comments to this entry are closed.