Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
« James Joyce, a poet and a prophet | Main | Saturday plans »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Amen to that. Joyce prophecied much, or much can be read into it.
Three quarks for Master Mark
Posted by: Bernardus Sylvestris | April 14, 2006 at 09:22 AM
It was as though a voice came from late 30's Paris and spoke directly to me.
Now I have a rejoinder to my partner if he calls from the next room and wonders what I am doing on the computer.
"It's High Modernism- dangitt"
-Frank Burdett "who has googled a few thingabibs in his time"
Posted by: Francis Burdett | April 15, 2006 at 12:43 AM
There is no apostrophe in Finnegans Wake.
Joyce wanted maximum meaning, and includes the invocation for all Finnegans(that's us) to wake.
Posted by: Bernardus | April 15, 2006 at 07:47 AM
Corrected.
Posted by: Carlos | April 15, 2006 at 05:31 PM
My quote was also incorrect, "Three quarks for Muster Mark!"
I always liked GellMann using Joyce to name the fundamental particles.
I just found this.
I like the following limerick by Avrum Gruner:
One quark for beauty's sake,
one quark to rhyme them,
One quark for riverrun,
past Adam, Eve, and Feynman,
In the laps of marble,
where discomforts lie.
Posted by: bernardus | April 16, 2006 at 01:30 AM
You know, when the study of quarks was still largely theoretical, Zweig called them 'aces', because he thought they were four of a kind (turns out there are six), while Feynman called them 'partons', which implies a pair. So we should be grateful to Gell-Mann, even if he was being something of a show-off.
Posted by: Carlos | April 16, 2006 at 03:08 AM