
No no no, not me. But I have friends! The White House Correspondents' Association dinner is a big press shindig held in D.C. where journalists, Washington figures, and minor celebrities mingle,
pretend to laugh, and swap respiratory viruses.
Last year, the lead performer at the dinner was the comedian
Cedric the Entertainer. God alone knows why. He managed to annoy Condoleezza Rice with his comedy routine, perhaps because they were two of the only black people in attendance. Paraphrasing: "At the White House, she's Condi. But when she gets home, she turns on Oprah and becomes
Leeza." The reaction shot of Rice was classic; it looked like she just chugged an entire jar of pickle juice on a bet.
Needless to say, Cedric the Entertainer was not back this year.
This year... This year, the entertainer was
Stephen Colbert.
The American president was sitting maybe ten feet away.
Links to footage
here. (Claudia and Doug, now that you have DSL, you will want to learn about torrents. JLU, the new Doctor Who, fuBball, etc.) The technical comedy term is 'roasted'.
You know, I felt a little pity for the man. He's never learned to deal with personal criticism very well, and is very easily wounded. But there's a line from Bujold: "Did you think you were dealing with amateurs?"
I am so making
Rich Dahm a pie.
I am playing it right now, and you can hear the jaw joints popping in the aghast silence. Holy bajoly.
Posted by: The New York City Math Teacher | May 02, 2006 at 01:49 AM
Since I have a more than amateur interest in both humor and wingnut studies, I've been following the reaction to Colbert's skit with interest.
Of course, the professional hypocrites are squealing like Ned Beatty. (That's what they're for. Louder! Louder!)
But I am a little surprised -- just a bit -- at the near-complete press reaction of "rock back and forth if I pretend he's not there the bad man will go away nananana."
I wonder, was it the line about contempt? or the one about writing the novel? I will have to buy some drinks and find out.
Posted by: Carlos | May 03, 2006 at 03:44 AM
I dunno, man. I don't mind politicians getting roasted at all, particularly not ones I voted for. Colbert, OTOH, varies a great deal as to quality. We turned him off last night after a couple of minutes. Very hit-or-miss as far as funny.
Now, Deliverance references are always funny. :^)
Posted by: Bernard Guerrero | May 03, 2006 at 06:23 PM
I really like the Michael O'Donoghue's quip, "Making people laugh is the lowest form of comedy."
But I agree, the show can sometimes be off-note. (I hope that everyone here realizes the Stephen Colbert persona is a group project.) It's an interesting, rather difficult comedic problem they've set up, and it might not be sustainable in the long run.
One thing I've learned, watching the edges of that world, is that the process of comedy has a lot in common with engineering.
Posted by: Carlos | May 04, 2006 at 05:49 AM
the process of comedy has a lot in common with engineering.
Begs the question, do comics & comedic writers get Brain Eaten[FN1]? Might this account for the later seasons of Laverne & Shirley, not to mention the vehicles the Seinfeld crew tried to set up afterwards?
[FN1] I think I've found an academic description of said same in Tetlock's Expert Political Judgment
Posted by: Bernard Guerrero | May 04, 2006 at 03:35 PM
Bernard, some of them are born Brain Eaten.
But the things you describe are Brain Eaten at a different level. The Seinfeld cast member spin-offs, that's a programming decision. I suspect the same thing happened to the later years of Laverne and Shirley -- let's move them to California! -- although I seem to recall the actress who played Shirley had personal difficulties.
Posted by: Carlos | May 04, 2006 at 05:51 PM